On December 5th, 84 organizations, led by Shattering Glass, called on President to instruct the US Archivist to publish the Equal Rights Amendment as the 28th Amendment to our Constitution.

In addition to gender and racial justice organizations, this diverse group includes democracy and voting focused organizations, military focused organizations, organizations focused on LGBTQIA+ rights, youth led/focused organizations, organizations focused on reproductive rights, medical associations and organizations, political parties and organizations, other professional associations and organizations.

The diversity of organizations and the millions of people they represent demonstrate the significance and urgency of ERA publication, the benefits the ERA will provide across society, the intersectionality of the movement, and the impact this issue could have on our democracy, as well as the 2024 elections. 

"This is the moment, and women, girls, the LGBTQIA+ community, and our democracy cannot afford to wait any longer. The time is now. We urge you to direct the Archivist to publish the ERA as the 28th Amendment immediately, thereby giving all Americans the most powerful tool available to meet the moment, preserve our democracy, and win the fight for gender equality."

If you are interested in signing-on to the letter, you may do so HERE.

The letter is below. A complete copy, with citations, may be found HERE.

______________

Dear President Biden:

As a diverse coalition of 84 organizations focused on equality for women, girls, and LGBTQIA+ people, which includes access to reproductive and gender-affirming healthcare, we are writing to urge you to instruct the United States Archivist (“Archivist”) to publish the Equal Rights Amendment (“ERA”) as the 28th Amendment to the Constitution without further delay.

As you are aware, the rights of women, girls, and LGBTQIA+ people are under attack throughout the United States. The impact of this growing trend is more acute for women of color, as their experience with sex discrimination is magnified by the intersection of discrimination on the basis of race and ethnicity.

While we applaud the efforts of your Administration to date, we need the foundation of the ERA to address these issues. The ERA is the most powerful tool available to protect these rights, guarantee equality for all, and strengthen our democracy. For the reasons stated below, we cannot afford to wait any longer.  

Background

Passed by Congress in 1972 with overwhelming bipartisan support, the ERA has been ratified since January 27, 2020, when Virgina became the 38th and final state needed to meet the required ratification by three-quarters of the States.

Since that time, the Archivist has had a statutory duty to publish the ERA as the 28th Amendment to the Constitution. That has not happened to date as the prior Administration interfered with the constitutional amendment process, asserting that, due to a purported time limit for ratifications and attempts by certain states to rescind their ratifications, the ERA has not been, and could not be, ratified, and that the constitutional amendment process must start anew.

Evident from testimony at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the ERA held earlier this year, the ERA is opposed, and its publication has been blocked, in large part, because it would protect reproductive and LGBTQIA+ rights, including gender-affirming care. 

Hundreds of prominent Constitutional scholars, including Harvard Professor Laurence Tribe and former US Senator Russ Feingold, President of the American Constitution Society, reject the prior Administration’s analysis. They have determined the ERA has satisfied all constitutional requirements, is currently the 28th Amendment, and must be published.

More specifically, Article V of the Constitution does not impose a time limit for ratification of a proposed amendment. In fact, the 27th Amendment was ratified in 1992, nearly 203 years after it was initially proposed.

Moreover, Article V of the Constitution does not authorize rescissions of ratifications. When New Jersey and Ohio purportedly rescinded their ratifications of the 14th Amendment, both States were counted among the ratifying States. Similarly, Tennessee attempted to rescind its ratification of the 19th Amendment, but its attempt was ignored, and the Amendment was published.

Having been proposed by two-thirds of each Chamber of Congress and ratified by more than three-fourths of the several States, the ERA has met the requirements of the Constitution under Article V, is enforceable as the 28th Amendment to the Constitution, and must be published.

Why Publication is The Next Critical Step 

The effect of the interference with the constitutional amendment process, blocking publication of the ERA, was to shift the burden of proof from the anti-equality opponents of the ERA to its proponents.

To date, five lawsuits, including Illinois v. Ferriero, have been filed to require publication of the ERA and/or enforce its validity. In each instance, the court has refused to rule based on seemingly insurmountable procedural hurdles. The most recent decision was issued on September 8, 2023, in Rhode Island, where the court stated that Congress has determined that publication must come before enforcement.

Until publication occurs, we are without judicial recourse, and the ERA is being held in legal limbo.

While publication of the ERA will not determine its validity, once published, it will be presumed valid, and the burden of proof will be on the opponents of equality and reproductive and LGBTQIA+ rights to prove otherwise. That is exactly as it should be and has been for the previous 27 Constitutional Amendments. Notably, the prior Administration took the unprecedented step of blocking publication of the ERA at a time when there was an already established conservative majority on the US Supreme Court.

Most importantly, when the ERA is published, we may begin to enforce it, as well as enact laws that further equality. And we need this more than ever to protects the rights of women, girls, and LGBTQIA+ people.

Given the political interference, related litigation, and the politization of equality, the current Archivist has indicated that she will not perform her ministerial duty unless directed by you, President Biden, to do so.

Why Immediate Publication Is Necessary

Since the United States Supreme Court issued the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (“Dobbs”) last year, attacks against the rights of women, girls, and LGBTQIA+ people have increased exponentially. Dobbs was always about more than reproductive rights. It was about denying women, girls and LGBTQIA+ people equal protection of the law to facilitate stripping away additional rights. There is no better example than the US v. Rahimi case currently before the Supreme Court, which will decide whether to permit domestic abusers subject to orders of protection to possess firearms.

Relying on the Dobbs decision, courts across the country have begun applying the lowest level of judicial review, rational basis, to sex-based discrimination claims, including challenges to abortion restrictions and gender-affirming care, and have rejected the claims. When courts apply strict scrutiny, which is required by the ERA, the likelihood of success for sex-based discrimination claims increases exponentially – from 20% to 73%. 

Equal rights provisions in state constitutions have been used as a basis to defeat abortion restrictions. The Utah abortion ban triggered by the Dobbs decision still has not taken effect as a result of the Equal Rights provisions in the Utah Constitution. Similarly, in Zurawski v. Texas, the court issued a preliminary injunction, based in part on the Texas ERA, which would prohibit the abortion ban from applying when medically necessary in a physician’s judgment.

In recent challenges to the Alabama, Kentucky and Tennessee gender-affirming care bans, the 11th and 6th Circuit Court of Appeals have applied the rational basis standard of review to the sex-based discrimination claims and upheld the bans. The young persons and their families have appealed the 6th Circuit’s decision upholding the Tennessee and Kentucky gender affirming care bans to the US Supreme Court, making ERA publication, and the strict scrutiny analysis that comes with it, all the more urgent.

Courts, however, will continue to apply the rational basis standard of review, making it nearly impossible to establish sex-based discrimination claims, until the ERA is published in the Constitution.

The United States is moving backwards, not forwards, with respect to gender equality, and the world is taking notice. The World Economic Forum recently released its 2023 Global Gender Gap Index, and the United States ranked 43rd out of 146 countries. That is a remarkable 16 place drop, from its 2022 ranking of 27th.  

The lack of gender equality in the United States, which is rapidly worsening, is negatively impacting our fragile democracy. The US was first listed as a backsliding democracy in 2021, and further weakened in 2022, due to polarization and threats to long-established rights. This backsliding has been made easier by the failure to publish the ERA. This link between the strength of our democracy and lack of gender equality has been reiterated repeatedly by Vice President Harris and Secretary Blinken.

In September 2023, a coalition representing the centers of nearly every former president from Herbert Hoover to Barack Obama (the “Former Presidents”) issued a collective call, for the first time ever, for the urgent need to protect our democracy. Specifically, they stated:

Americans have a strong interest in supporting democratic movements and respect for human rights around the world because free societies elsewhere contribute to our own security and prosperity here at home. But that interest is undermined when others see our own house in disarray. The world will not wait for us to address our problems, so we must both continue to strive toward a more perfect union and help those abroad looking for U.S. leadership.

As predicted by the centers of the Former Presidents, the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations recently responded to the Fifth Periodic Report of the US, condemning the US Government’s failure to meet its obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Specifically, the Human Rights Committee called for the Equal Rights Amendment to be included in our Constitution when it stated:

18. While welcoming the various measures taken by the State party to advance gender equality, including the establishment of the White House Gender Policy Council in 2021, the Committee regrets the lack of explicit guarantee in the Constitution against sex and gender-based discrimination (arts. 2 and 3). 19. The [United States] should redouble its efforts to guarantee protection against sex and gender-based discrimination in its Constitution, including through initiatives such as the Equal Rights Amendment. 

The ERA is a powerful tool available to put an end to the rollback of democracy and civil rights. To guarantee equality for all, free from the whims of anti-equality judges and politicians. To guarantee equal pay and opportunities. To restore reproductive rights. To protect from domestic violence and sexual harassment. To end gender and pregnancy discrimination, and more.

In light of the above, there has been a surge in calls for the immediate publication of the ERA, including the following:

• Two resolutions affirming that the ERA is the 28th Amendment and urging the Archivist to publish it (H.J.Res. 82 and S.J.Res 39) were introduced in Congress in July and have the support of [64 Representatives and 22 Senators];

• State Legislatures in California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Michigan, and Minnesota have affirmed the ERA is the 28th Amendment, and Hawaii, Michigan and Illinois have called for its immediate publication; and

• The North Carolina Democratic Party and Democrats Abroad recently passed resolutions urging your administration to publish the ERA.

Recent polling reflects this trend and confirms constitutional gender equality is wildly popular. Per a study conducted by Lake Research Partners, 70% of voters – 89% of Democrats, 72% of Independents, 46% of Republicans – support placing the ERA in the Constitution to prohibit sex discrimination and provide equal rights for women and men and on the basis of gender.

During your recent meeting with the President of Chile, you stated:

In my view, there comes a time, maybe every six to eight generations, where the world changes in a very short time. And I think what happens in the next two, three years are going to determine what the world looks like for the next five or six decades.

We agree, President Biden. This is the moment, and women, girls, the LGBTQIA+ community, and our democracy cannot afford to wait any longer. The time is now.

Accordingly, we urge you to direct the Archivist to publish the ERA as the 28th Amendment immediately, thereby giving all Americans the most powerful tool available to meet the moment, preserve our democracy, and win the fight for gender equality.

Sincerely,

Shattering Glass

National ERA Publication Task Force

AAUW Maryland

Accomplices of the Dayton Area SURJ

Allegany County Women's Action Coalition

American Association of University Women

American Constitution Society

American Medical Women's Association

Arkansas State Chapter of NOW

Business and Professional Women/Ohio-Akron local

Center for Common Ground

Central OH Indivisible

Charlottesville NOW (National Organization for Women)

Christian Faith Ministries of Garden City (Michigan)

Civic Health Alliance

Combat Sexual Assault

Coshocton Business and Professional Women

Democrats Abroad

Doctors for America

Dublin Progressives

Elizabeth Cady Stanton Trust

EQUAL MEANS EQUAL

Equality Illinois

Equality Now

ERA Minnesota

ERA Task Force AZ

ERA-NC Alliance

Free Speech For People

Generation Ratify

Georgia NOW

Girls Inc.

Greene County Ohio Democratic Party

Heroica Foundation

Illinois Federation of Teachers

Indiana Women's Action Movement

Indivisible

Indivisible Chicago Alliance

Indivisible Delaware Ohio

Indivisible Downtown Chicago

Indivisible Evanston

Indivisible Chicago-SouthSide

Jewish Women International

Maryland Chapter, National Organization for Women

Mid-Day Women's Alliance of Appleton, WI

Military & Veteran Women's Coalition

MomsRising

National Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women's Health (NPWH)

National Center for Lesbian Rights

National Council of Jewish Women

National Council of Negro Women

National Organization for Women (NOW)

National Organization for Women, Asheville Chapter (Asheville NOW)

National Organization for Women, North Carolina Chapter (NC NOW)

National Organization for Women, Raleigh Chapter (Raleigh NOW)

National Safe Parents Organization

National Women's Political Caucus

Nevada NOW

Ohio Alliance to End Sexual Violence

Ohio Democratic Women's Caucus

Ohio National Organization for Women

Ohio NOW Education and Legal Fund

Ohio NOW, Akron Chapter

Ohio Valley NOW

Patient Care Heroes

Physicians for Reproductive Health

Professional Women's Club of Chicago

Re-Sisters of Central Ohio

Resisters

Saratoga Caucus for Reproductive Rights

Sexual Violence Prevention Association (SVPA)

SIECUS: Sex Ed for Social Change

Sojourners-SojoAction

Southeast Progressives of Franklin County

Strike for America

Sugarcreek Cares

The Feminist Uprising

The Ohio Federation of Business & Professional Women

Trans Formations Project

Virginia National Organization for Women (NOW)

Women Employed

Women Injured in Combat (WINC)

Women's March Chicago

ZONTA International

Zonta USA Caucus